Did Christopher Columbus and his men introduce syphilis into Renaissance Europe, after contracting it during their voyage to the New World? Or does this pathogen have a much older history? A study by Kristin Harper and colleagues published last week in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases lends support to what’s known as the Columbian theory of syphilis’s origin while suggesting that the non-sexually-transmitted subspecies arose earlier in the Old World.
The study spread throughout both mainstream press and science blogosphere alike, as did a related Expert Commentary, written by Connie Mulligan and colleagues, that challenged the methods and findings of the syphilis study.
Bora made sure that “syphilis” was the buzzword of the day on ScienceBlogs, and three of his SciBlings’ amazing blogs are highlighted here:
Aetiology: Where did syphilis come from?
Afarensis: Syphils: The View from Bioarchaeology
Greg Laden: The Origin of Syphilis
The study was picked up by more than 100 outlets total. Some of the excellent coverage is highlighted here:
Los Angeles Times: Add syphilis to Columbus' discoveries, study says
National Geographic: Did Columbus Bring Syphilis to Europe?
New Scientist: Columbus blamed for spread of syphilis
New York Times: Genetic Study Bolsters Columbus Link to Syphilis
Scientific American: Did Columbus Bring Syphilis to Europe?
Telegraph: Columbus did bring syphilis from America
Toronto Star: New twist on old scourge
U.S. News & World Report: Columbus Carried Syphilis From New World to Europe, Study Suggests
The paper was also covered by Economist, Bloomberg, CBC News, CTV.ca, ABC News, MSNBC, Fox News, and, quite unfortunately, Rush Limbaugh.