Stand Up for Science
February 17, 2017 Editor’s Note: For a nonpartisan assessment of Why Scientists Must Also Be Advocates and suggestions for what you can do now to connect to the public, listen to a podcast with Mary Woolley, president of Research!America
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7318-5892
“You look at science (or at least talk of it) as some sort of demoralizing invention of man, something apart from real life, and which must be cautiously guarded and kept separate from everyday existence. But science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated.” -Rosalind Franklin
In this current political climate, facts matter more than ever. With responsibility as a leading Open Access publisher, a beacon of positive change to archaic systems, PLOS loudly stands up for science and scientists around the world in their efforts to improve the health and well-being of societies and explain the wonder of the world around and beyond us.
Back in the 17th and 18th centuries, enlightenment thinkers advanced politics, philosophy, science and communication; they supported equality and human dignity, and opposed superstition, intolerance and bigotry. Scientific thinking and the scientific method was a critical shaper of the enlightenment. As we look at the world around us, we must ask, what has the scientific method brought to our world, and to our world view? To answer this question, we must let the data speak for itself. Your data. My data. And the data of every geologist, atmospheric scientist, evolutionary biologist, geneticist, physicist, engineer, software developer and physician scientist. This is a position PLOS has exemplified through its Open Data policy and we strongly support the Office of Science and Technology Policy’s guidance, provided most recently in its January 6, 2017 memo, on this important area.
Science in Action
But how can this data speak when science communication is blocked from reaching the public and the scientists themselves are prevented from reaching their labs, their communities, their places of work? Access to information, access to research and data enables better policy decisions. In turn, policies informed by publicly and privately funded data and created by enlightened governments, academic communities, patient advocacy groups and global coalitions all power improvements in our world. Climate change, vaccine safety and animal welfare are among the many areas where we support the scientific endeavor to inform the debate with data-based evidence, and organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization rely on data-based evidence to foster human health both in the US and around the world.
It is impossible for PLOS to know how many of our global network of nearly 7,000 editors, more than 78,000 reviewers and authors from more than 190 countries are on any particular type of visa. We do know science is, and has been for generations, an international endeavor. Scientists collaborate and travel for post-doctoral fellowships, conferences, review panels, sabbaticals and speaking engagements. Conceptual understanding, testable hypothesis, well-designed studies, observational methods and sufficient replication are the tenets of science discussed during these meetings, as well as during routine days in the lab. These tenets of science are upheld by all researchers, regardless of nationality, religion, race, gender, sexual orientation, career stage or professional stature. Immigration restrictions inhibit that free exchange of knowledge.
As a nonprofit publisher, innovator and advocacy organization founded to accelerate progress in science communication, we must advocate for what we know to be true: PLOS must not only liberate science communication from the constraints of traditional publishing, we must stand up for science to ensure the liberation of scientific facts, intelligent discourse and conclusions based on data. Given that PLOS’ primary mission is the elimination of barriers to the open dissemination of scientific research, we’re naturally against policies and practices that increase, rather than decrease, obstacles.
In a world that abruptly and forcefully presents challenges of accessibility, accountability and discovery, a rigorous commitment to our core principles and mission to transform how research results are communicated is even more critical. A growing international community of readers, educators, policy makers, scientists and entrepreneurs share, reuse and remix Open Access research article content without restriction—advancing the innovation economy and the health of communities around the world.
We continue to support the scientific community from which we were founded and to be vocal in pushing the continued expansion of open science. We support, and will be represented at, the March for Science in Washington—now scheduled for Earth Day April 22nd! We look forward to seeing you there.
To reach The Official PLOS Blog team, email email@example.com or leave a comment below.
[…] 科学のために立ち上がる|Stand Up for Science […]
Thanks Nola M !
We support you and we stand up for science! March for Science, Earth Day, 4/22
Wow! As a scientist and researcher, I find this really commendable and encouraging. It sure makes me want to submit my papers to PLOS over other journals that have not taken as firm a stand. Thank you!
Plan to attend the March for Science. Need all scientists and non-scientists to March
Important now more than ever.
Will be marching too!
Thank you for taking a position on this issue!!
I completely agree with both PLOS and AAAS on these issues and do plan to participate in the March. My wife participated in the Million Women March and the real value of that March was the subsequent planning for substantive follow-on steps.
Scientific communications based on universal open access to data fosters integrity in research and confidence in public policy decisions based on this data. In this era, scientific societies and high profile journals must steadfastly campaign for the critical role of data-driven policy in the maintenance of a free society.
Thank you PLOS for standing up for science. This is absolutely essential in these horrifyingly frightening times. See you at the March
PLOS ONE is right on! We all need to stand up for science, inclusiveness and the dissemination of knowledge!
This non scientist supporter will be marching.
Naturally, as scientists we need to bend over backwards to keep the practice of science itself non-political. But as scientist citizens and as citizens of science we need to engage in issues that are critical for the world we live in and the practice of science. I want to applaud PLoS for stepping up on this. Hear! Hear!
Comment submitted 2/20/2017 by reader and posted by Admin:
“…cheers for a incredible post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t
have time to go through it all at the moment but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read more, Please do keep up the great work.”
Kudos & thank-you to PLOS for standing up for science. We need more science & facts, not fewer.
[…] Galilei, who fought against the church in the first half of the 17th century. In fact, as a recent PLOS post mentions, many enlightened scientists stood up against ignorance during the 17th and 18th century. […]
This was such a great, motivational post! Thank you for your commitment to PLOS values, and because of this, I will also be Marching for Science come Earth Day!
Standing by” Evidence-based knowledge in the scientific world translates to faster development especially in resource constraint economies of the world.
[…] scientists from around the world are uniting in making the world more balanced and more enjoyable (click here for more on scientists taking a good stand). This is by no means an easy task; to achieve this, scientists need the help of every single […]