Skip to content

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

PLOS BLOGS The Official PLOS Blog

New options for posting a medRxiv preprint at PLOS

Starting today, PLOS Global Public Health and PLOS Digital Health, will join the other PLOS journals publishing health research in giving submitting authors the option to have their manuscript forwarded to medRxiv to be considered for posting as a preprint. In offering this free service, we aim to make preprint posting simple and easy, giving researchers more flexibility in how they choose to communicate their science. Researchers, of course, also remain free to post to medRxiv or another preprint server prior to submitting.

The initial integration between PLOS and medRxiv, implemented earlier this year, has already received an enthusiastic response from our community. In less than two months, the authors of over 250 manuscripts submitted to PLOS Medicine, PLOS NTDs and PLOS ONE have elected to have their submissions sent on to medRxiv.* 

It’s easy to see why. Preprints bring both individual and community benefits. Authors can use preprints as a tool to establish priority, broadcast results, seek feedback, increase readership, and bolster grant, job or tenure applications. More broadly, preprints support efficient and inclusive scientific communications. Publicly sharing a research manuscript before peer review surfaces results sooner, opening opportunities for collaboration and facilitating peer review.

The immediacy and accessibility of preprints, combined with expert checks that help to ensure responsible preprint posting, make medRxiv a particularly strong partner for journals like PLOS Global Public Health and PLOS Digital Health, that prioritize openness and inclusion, technological innovation, and scientific rigor.

“During the pandemic, we have all seen the value of rapid communication of medical research via preprints. But we have also seen the need for careful and rigorous peer review in tackling bad science. By integrating medRxiv with PLOS GPH, we are supporting both goals – rapid sharing of research as well as thoughtful peer-review before publication.”

– Madhu Pai, Editor-in-Chief, PLOS Global Public Health

“Among the core values of PLOS Digital Health is the promotion of ethically conducted, inclusive, and immediately accessible research. As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, there is a critical need for the scientific community to be able to leverage information and communication technology to create and validate knowledge that is rapidly evolving. The use of preprint servers, most notably medRxiv, is integral to this vision of a near real-time iterative knowledge system, as they facilitate the immediate dissemination, public discussion, and open discourse of emerging studies. As the analyses iterate based on feedback from the research community, however, it remains important that they undergo formal peer review before entering into the permanent scientific record. With the collaboration between PLOS Digital Health and medRxiv, we are able to synergistically achieve both goals—ensuring that practice-informing results are not delayed from preliminary contributions to the discourse by the inherent time delays of the publication process.”

– Leo Anthony Celi,  Editor-in-Chief, PLOS Digital Health

Going forward, we’ll continue to grow our open research offerings for authors across all PLOS journals, including integrations with community-supported preprint servers spanning a broader range of subject areas, and more tools and services to support research integrity, access, and inclusivity.

*Data covers the period from the January 6 2022 launch to February 28 2022

Related Posts
Back to top