In preparation for the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) negotiations, a group of experts came together in late 2021, convened by GEO…
In a new study from PLOS ONE, researchers explore relationships between domestic cats’ hormone levels, gut microbiomes, and social behaviors – shedding light on how these solitary animals can cohabitate together in high densities. Learn more about the findings from Hikari Koyasu of Azabu University in Kanagawa, Japan, and colleagues in our Research Highlights summary below or access the full study in PLOS ONE.
Background and Study Design
Most feline species display solitary and territorial behavior, but domestic cats often live in high densities, raising the question of what strategies cats use to establish cohabitating groups. Social behaviors of cats can be influenced by hormones and the mix of different microbe species living in their guts—known as the gut microbiome. Studying these factors could help illuminate the group dynamics of cohabitating cats.
With this in mind, Koyasu and colleagues conducted a two-week-long study of three different groups of five cats living together in a shelter. They used video cameras to observe the cats’ behavior, measured hormone levels in their urine, and collected feces to evaluate the mix of microbial species in the cats’ microbiomes.
Statistical analysis of the data revealed that cats with high levels of the hormones cortisol and testosterone had less contact with other cats, and those with high testosterone were more likely to try to escape. Meanwhile, cats with low cortisol and testosterone were more tolerant in their interactions with other cats. The researchers also found greater similarity of gut microbiomes between cats who had more frequent contact with each other, and they found links between the gut microbiome, social behavior, and cortisol levels.
Meanwhile, contrary to the researchers’ expectations from research on animals that typically live in groups, cats with high levels of the hormone oxytocin did not display bonding behaviors described as “socially affiliative.” This suggests that oxytocin might function differently for typically solitary animals living in groups than for animals that typically live in groups.
The researchers outline possible directions for future research to further deepen understanding of cohabitating cat dynamics, such as a follow-up study that observes cats for several months, rather than just two weeks, and investigations to tease out causal relationships between hormones and social behaviors.
The authors add: “Low testosterone and cortisol concentrations in cats enabled them to share the space and live together, but the higher the oxytocin, the less affiliative behavior with others and the more lonely they are. The function of oxytocin was different from that of affinity for a group-mate. Cats may not consider other individuals living in the same space as tight relationship group-mates.”